USPTO serial 75825260
HI-FI MEDIA REPLICATORS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HI-FI MEDIA REPLICATORS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Valley Village, CA
Valley Village, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Duplication and replication of compact discs, audiotapes, cassette tapes, VHS tapes, CD ROMs, DVDs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 17, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |