USPTO serial 75825527
VEGAN LIVING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3325039Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2007
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VEGAN LIVING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Lake Forest, CA
Lake Forest, CA
Lake Forest, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES AND ON-LINE ORDERING SERVICES PROVIDED BY MEANS OF A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK AND WHOLESALE DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES ALL FEATURING ENVIRONMENTAL, ORGANIC AND NATURAL LIVING PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE ESTABLISHMENT AND OPERATION OF BUSINESSES; DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA ON-LINE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK; DATABASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 23, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 18, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 31, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| May 8, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 26, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 5, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |