Drawing for SQUENNISH

USPTO serial 75825616

SQUENNISH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SQUENNISH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, MEN'S, LADIES' AND CHILDREN'S UPPER GARMENTS, NAMELY, SHIRTS, TROUSERS, SKIRTS, SUITS, DRESSES, JACKETS, AND SPORTS GARMENTS, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SWEATERS, SHORTS, PANTS, TROUSERS, SKIRTS, SUITS, TRACK SUITS, WINDBREAKER, FOOTWEAR AND HEADGEARACTIVE
028GAMES AND TOYS, NAMELY, HAND HELD UNIT FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES, STAND ALONE VIDEO GAMES, GYMNASTIC APPARATUS, RACKETS FOR USE WITH A BALL GAME DERIVED FROM TENNIS AND SQUASH, BATTING GLOVES, KNEE PADS AND ELBOW PADS, BALL TRAINING APPARATUS USED FOR PITCHING BALLSACTIVE
041PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR RACKET SPORTS TOURNAMENTS AND ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING ATHLETIC COMPETITIONSACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 29, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 26, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Oct 29, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Jun 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 12, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 5, 2000AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance