USPTO serial 75825672
PURINDULGENCE.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AN, GI HYUN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURINDULGENCE.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin I. Saperstein
MARTIN I SAPERSTEIN GOODMAN & SAPERSTEIN666 OLD COUNTRY RDGARDEN CITY, NY 11530UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services in the field of tobacco, bulk chocolates, boxed chocolates, assorted nuts, hard candy, jellybeans, cookies, tobacco pipes, cigars, cigarettes, assorted cigarette and cigar lighters, cigar cutters, cigar jewelry, and gift baskets consisting of chocolates, cookies, and candies; computerized on-line retail store services in the field of tobacco, bulk chocolates, boxed chocolates, assorted nuts, hard candy, jellybeans, cookies, tobacco pipes, cigars, cigarettes, assorted cigarette and cigar lighters, cigar cutters, cigar jewelry, and gift baskets consisting of chocolates, cookies, and candies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 25, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 2, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |