USPTO serial 75826490
CONSTRUCTIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CONSTRUCTIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consulting services; strategic business planning consultation services; employment counseling and recruitment services; product and market consulting and general business consulting to private and/or public companies | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial investment consultation services; capital investment consultation services; equity investments in public and private companies; financial investment in the field of technology, computer, software, communications, health care, biotech and start-up/pre-IPO companies in other industries; financial consulting in initial public offering strategy and implementation | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stikeleather, Gregory
- Other trademarks owned by Stikeleather, Gregory
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named CONSTRUCTIVE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |