USPTO serial 75826792
MICROMASK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 6, 2003
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with MICROMASK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Wilimington, DE
Wilmington, DE
PARTICLE DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL, LLC
St. Louis, MO
Other trademarks owned by PARTICLE DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Wilmington, DE
Wilimington, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joel R. Samuels
Joel R. Samuels Harness, Dickey and Pierce, PLC7700 BonhommeSuite 400ST. LOUIS, MO 63105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemical tastemasking additives, stability and flavor enhancers, for use in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals, namely, [ hormones, analgesics, anti-diabetics, ] antihistamines, [ anti-infectives, anti-aging agents, anti-senility agents, ] anti-nausea agents, [ anti-tussives, cardiovascular agents, ] [ central nervous system pharmaceuticals for the treatment of ] [ Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, ] [ epilepsy, seizures ]; [ and decongestants, diuretics, electrolytes, expectorants, fertility agents, birth control agents, ] neonatal agents, [ oncologicals, ] osteoporetic, nutraceuticals, [ nutritional supplements, ][ herbal supplements, ][ vitamins, ][ cosmetics, and health and beauty aids, namely, toothpaste, skin lotions, hand creams, skin creams, hair creams, bath powders; agricultural and aquacultural products, namely, animal feed, fish feed, fish attractants, ] pharmaceuticals, namely, hormones, anti-infectives, fertility agents [, and animal health products, namely, nutritional supplements and vitamins, ] [ herbal supplements, ] [ medications, namely, antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and anti-infectives ] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Drugtech Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Drugtech Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by PARTICLE DYNAMICS INTERNATIONAL, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Drugtech Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Drugtech Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Similar marks named MICROMASK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2023 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 30, 2023 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 30, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 4, 2023 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 11, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 10, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 30, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |