USPTO serial 75826851
PYCNO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PYCNO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-1216 Cointrin/Geneva, CH
CH-1216 Cointrin/Geneva, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL A ADLER
MICHAEL A ADLER COBRIN & GITTES750 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 14, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |