USPTO serial 75826886
CAYENNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAYENNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
70435 Stuttgart-Zuffenhausen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jana L. France
JANA L FRANCE FISH & RICHARDSON, PC3300 DAIN RAUSCHER PLZ60 S SIXTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely anoraks, beachwear, belts, blazers, blouses, blousons, body suits, cardigans, coats, dresses, footwear, foul weather gear, gloves, headwear, infantwear, jackets, jeans, jogging suits, knitwear, leather coats, leather jackets, overalls, pants, parkas, polo shirts, scarves, shirts, shorts, ski wear, skirts, slacks, sleepwear, snow suits, socks, suits, sun visors, sweat bands, sweatshirts, sweaters, T-shirts, tennis wear, neckties, tights, tops, tracksuits, trousers, underwear, vests and writs bands | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 3, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 3, 2001 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |