USPTO serial 75826909
Serial No. 75826909
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 75826909?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
B-8501 Kortrijk-Heule, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James C. Wray
JAMES C WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | common or base metal and their alloys in sheet, rod, bar and/or billet form; portable metal building; metal tubes for general industrial use; metal chimney pots | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | barbecues grills and replacement parts therefor, namely, flues and lighting units; gas or electric cooking tables and built in ovens; gas pressure cookers and electric pressure cookers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 31, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |