Drawing for Serial No. 75826909

USPTO serial 75826909

Serial No. 75826909

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CAIN, CATHERINE P
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 75826909?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James C. Wray

JAMES C WRAY1493 CHAIN BRIDGE RD STE 300MCLEAN, VA 22101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006common or base metal and their alloys in sheet, rod, bar and/or billet form; portable metal building; metal tubes for general industrial use; metal chimney potsACTIVE—
011barbecues grills and replacement parts therefor, namely, flues and lighting units; gas or electric cooking tables and built in ovens; gas pressure cookers and electric pressure cookersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 3, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 31, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 31, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 21, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 2, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 2, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 31, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2004CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 3, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 14, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 12, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 30, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 27, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance