USPTO serial 75827366
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, telephone communication services, paging services, cellular telephone services, telephone voice messaging services, and electronic transmission of messages and data | ABANDONED | Oct 15, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |