USPTO serial 75827472
NEGOTIATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEGOTIATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sherman Oaks, CA
Sherman Oaks, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen J Strauss
STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLPHOWARD HUGHES CTR6060 CTR DR 10TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90045Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE ORDERING OF NEW USED AUTOMOBILES; COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE ORDERING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF AUTOMOTIVE AFTERMARKET ACCESSORIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | COMPUTERIZED INSURANCE BROKERAGE, ON-LINE FINANCING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | COMPUTERIZED LEASING OF NEW AND USED AUTOMOBILES AND VEHICLE TOWING SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Autoland, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Autoland, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named NEGOTIATOR
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 16, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |