Drawing for OBTREE

USPTO serial 75827603

OBTREE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WARD, JOYCE A.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OBTREE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael J. Berger

MICHAEL J BERGER AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE TO ENHANCE THE AUDIO-VISUAL CAPABILITIES OF MULTIMEDIA APPLICATIONS, NAMELY FOR THE INTEGRATION OF TEXT, AUDIO, GRAPHICS, STILL IMAGES AND MOVING PICTURES AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD THEREWITHACTIVE—
016PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY INSTRUCTION MANUALS AND REFERENCE BOOKS ABOUT COMPUTER SOFTWAREACTIVE—
035LICENSING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; RETAIL STORE SERVICES, AVAILABLE THOUGH COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS AND INTERACTIVE TELEVISION, FEATURING COMPUTER SOFTWAREACTIVE—
042RENTAL OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE, MAINTENANCE AND MODERNIZATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE CONSULTING AND DESIGN FOR OTHERS, NAMELY DEVELOPMENT, ADAPTION, CONFIGURATION, ACTUALIZATION AND EXAMINATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWAREACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 4, 2003EX3MSOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
Sep 4, 2003EX3DSOU EXTENSION 3 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Aug 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 16, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 18, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 19, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 19, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 27, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 7, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 26, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 18, 2000REINREINSTATED—
Oct 31, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance