USPTO serial 75827660
TUMORTECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TUMORTECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Londonderry, NH
Londonderry, NH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM F LAWRENCE
WILLIAM F LAWRENCE FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Diagnostic preparations for scientific or research use, in particular, peptides; peptides used in the manufacture of pharmaceuticals; peptides for use in scientific diagnostic test kits | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Imaging agents for use in in vivo medical or veterinary diagnostic imaging; peptides used in medical, clinical and veterinary diagnostic test kits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 29, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |