USPTO serial 75827739
EDY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EDY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BLANK OR PRE-RECORDED INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARDS CONTAINING INTEGRATED CHIPS TO BE USED AS ID CARDS, CREDIT CARDS, CASH CARDS, DEBIT CARDS, AND TRAFFIC TICKETS; CONTACTLESS READERS AND WRITERS FOR ELECTRONIC DATA SIGNALS FROM INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARDS CONTAINING INTEGRATED CHIPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | FINANCIAL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY ELECTRONIC MEANS; ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER; ELECTRONIC PAYMENT, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENT DATA; FINANCIAL CLEARING HOUSES; BANKING; BILL PAYMENT SERVICES; FUNDS INVESTMENTS; ELECTRONIC PAYMENT, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENT DATA USING INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARDS CONTAINING INTEGRATED CHIPS AND BATTERIES AS A MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 19, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PR.W | PETITION TO REVIVE WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 21, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |