USPTO serial 75827777
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin P. Crosby
KEVIN P. CROSBY BRINKLEY MORGAN SOLOMON TATUM ET AL200 E LAS OLAS BLVD STE 1900FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301-2248UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | HOTEL, MOTEL AND RESTAURANT SERVICES | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Apr 4, 1996 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 10, 2008 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 7, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 30, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |