USPTO serial 75827778
BEST VALUE INN BRAND MEMBERSHIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEST VALUE INN BRAND MEMBERSHIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin P. Crosby
LOUIS R. GIGLIOTTI BRINKLEY, MCNERNEY, MORGAN, ET AL200 EAST LAS OLAS BOULEVARDSUITE 1900FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | management and consultation services in the field of franchising hotels and assisting with the establishment of franchises; aiding in the establishment, consultation and operation of hotel and motel business for others | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | making hotel reservations for others | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cal-Vegas, Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by THIRTY EIGHT STREET, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THIRTY EIGHT STREET, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BEST VALUE INN BRAND MEMBERSHIP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 17, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2006 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| May 16, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 16, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 16, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |