USPTO serial 75827842
THE ART OF MOTION CONTROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE ART OF MOTION CONTROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
97816 Lohr am Main, DE
97816 Lohr am Main, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric motors for machines, namely, electric motors and servomotors as parts of machinery for industrial use; control units as parts of machinery | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electrical and electronic controllers, regulating, switching and monitoring devices, namely, electrical power supply units; systems consisting of electrical and electronic controllers, regulating, switching and monitoring devices, namely, electrical power supply units; computer programs for operating control and regulating devices, namely, applications software for automating production machines; computer programs for controlling the work sequences of production machines and for graphic presentation of the program sequence and processing the sequence of such programs for driving machine axes; control units for driving machine axes, namely, drive controllers, converters, and invertors for driving electro motors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rexroth Indramat GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Rexroth Indramat GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named THE ART OF MOTION CONTROL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | 44ED | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |