USPTO serial 75827923
Serial No. 75827923
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 16, 2005
- Examiner
- CHARLON, BARNEY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with Serial No. 75827923?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ORLANDO, FL
CNL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC.
ORLANDO, FL
Orlando, FL
CNL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, LLC
ORLANDO, FL
ORLANDO, FL
CNL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC.
ORLANDO, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS STRATEGIC PLANNING AND CONSULTING SERVICES; PLANNING AND CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND GROWTH OF NEW BUSINESSES, PARTICULARLY TECHNOLOGY AND E-COMMERCE BUSINESSES | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2001 |
| 036 | REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT, BROKERAGE, CONSULTING AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES; REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST SERVICES; MORTGAGE AND COMMERCIAL FINANCING SERVICES; INVESTMENT AND COMMERCIAL BANKING SERVICES; BROKER/DEALER SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES, FRANCHISE, MORTGAGE, MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS, REAL ESTATE AND INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES; FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES; INSURANCE UNDERWRITING, BROKERAGE AND AGENCY SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF COMMERCIAL LIABILITY, CASUALTY AND PROPERTY | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2000 |
| 037 | REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2003 |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, namely, CLASSES, WORKSHOPS AND SEMINARS IN THE FIELD OF BUSINESS AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT, COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, [ WORD PROCESSING, ] RESEARCH SKILLS, HUMAN RESOURCES AND PERSONNEL, INSURANCE, FINANCE, MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS, ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, PUBLIC SPEAKING AND COMMUNICATION, REAL ESTATE, AND SALES AND MARKETING | ACTIVE | Jan 31, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CNL HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CNL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CNL Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by CNL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CNL HOLDINGS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by CNL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2025 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 21, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 21, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 27, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 15, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 14, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2011 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 24, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |