USPTO serial 75830074
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ELKE F. SUBER
ELKE F SUBER AKIN, GUMP, STRAUSS, HAUER & FELD, LLPONE COMMERCE SQ STE 22002005 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7086| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Retail store services, available through computer communications and interactive television; promoting the goods and services of others by arranging for sponsors to affiliate their goods and services with an electronic distribution service, and promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements and product access information in an electronic format accessed through a global computer network, and promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements in television advertising, and promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of discount cards, and promoting the goods and services of others by awarding purchase points for credit card use or by awarding purchase points for making purchases through the service, and promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of printed material and promotional contests. All in International Class 35. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 9, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |