USPTO serial 75831168
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Salt Lake City, UT
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
SALT LAKE CITY, UT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN C. STRINGHAM
JOHN C STRINGHAM WORKMAN, NYDEGGER & SEELEY1000 EAGLE GATE TWR60 E S TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Providing reinsurance underwriting services and information in the field of reinsurance via a website on a global communication network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 15, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 10, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |