USPTO serial 75832830
VESPA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3016529Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 22, 2005
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VESPA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
56025 PONTEDERA, PROVINCE OF PISA, IT
56025 PONTEDERA, PROVINCE OF PISA, IT
56025 PONTEDERA, PROVINCE OF PISA, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN C HOLMAN
JOHN C HOLMAN JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLCTHE JENIFER BLDG400 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MEAT; FISH; POULTRY AND GAME; MEAT EXTRACTS; PRESERVED, DRIED, AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JELLIES; JAMS; FRUIT SAUCES; EGGS; MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS, NAMELY CHEESES; CREAM; DAIRY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, DAIRY-BASED CHOCOLATE FOOD BEVERAGES, DAIRY-BASED DIPS, DAIRY-BASED FOOD BEVERAGES, MARGARINE; SOUR CREAM, BUTTER, YOGURT, AND WHIPPING CREAM | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | coffee; tea; coca; sugar; rice; tapioca; sago; artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, namely, cereal-based snack foods, ready to eat cereal derived food bars, breakfast cereals, processed cereals; breads; pastries; confectionery chips for baking; flavored ices; honey treacle; yeast; baking powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; sauces; condiments, namely, salad dressings; spices; and ice | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 032 | BEER; MINERAL AND AERATED WATER; OTHER NON-ALCOHOLIC DRINKS, NAMELY, COLAS, NON-ALCOHOLIC MALT BEVERAGES, POP SOFT DRINKS, SOFT DRINKS, NON-ALCOHOLIC PUNCH, SPORT DRINKS, TOMATO JUICE, VEGETABLE JUICE, NON-ALCOHOL AND DE-ALCOHOLIZED WINES; FRUIT DRINKS AND FRUIT JUICES; SYRUPS AND OTHER PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING SOFT DRINKS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 033 | ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY WINE | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR BARS, RESTAURANTS, HOTELS, DANCING SALONS, GYMNASIUMS, AND BEAUTY SALONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | BARS, RESTAURANTS, HOTELS, SALOONS WITH ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF DANCING, BEAUTY SALONS AND CATERING SERVICES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PIAGGIO & C. S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PIAGGIO & C. S.p.A.
- Other trademarks owned by PIAGGIO & C. S.p.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VESPA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 12, 2005 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 17, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2000 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2000 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |