USPTO serial 75834388
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
27920 SAINT PIERRE DE BAILLEUL, FR
27920 SAINT PIERRE DE BAILLEUL, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brewster Taylor
BREWSTER TAYLOR - SOLELY AS DOM. REP LARSON & TAYLOR PLC1199 N FAIRFAX ST STE 900ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | FABRIC FOR TEXTILE USE; BED COVERS, NAMELY BED LINEN PERFUMED OR NOT, BED SHEETS PERFUMED OR NOT, BED SPREADS PERFUMED OR NOT, BED SMALL CUSHION COVERS PERFUMED OR NOT; BED PADS PERFUMED OR NOT; TABLE COVERS, NAMELY FABRIC TABLE CLOTHS | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY SHIRTS, PANTS, HATS, SWEATERS, SKIRTS AND DRESSES; HEADWEAR; FOOTWEAR, NOT INCLUDING FOOTWEAR FOR ORTHOPEDIC PURPOSES | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 19, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 19, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |