Drawing for FARM BRAND

USPTO serial 75837884

FARM BRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FARM BRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOAN L. LONG

JOAN L LONG MAYER, BROWN & PLATT190 S LA SALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal tubing; metal hose and pipe fittings; metal pipe couplings; metal pipe connectorsINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
009Automatic valvesINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
011LAWN AND GARDEN IRRIGATION PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SPRINKLERS, SPRINKLER HEADS, PLUMBING FITTINGS, NAMELY VALVESACTIVE—
017Plastic tubing for irrigation purposes; non-metal hose and pipe fittings; non-metal pipe couplings and connectors for lawn and garden irrigationINACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED—
021LAWN AND GARDEN WATERING PRODUCTS, NAMELY SPRINKLERS, SPRAYERS, ATTACHED TO GARDEN HOSES, SPRINKLER HEADS, PLASTIC SPRAY NOZZLES, AND HOSE NOZZLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2001ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 5, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 13, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance