USPTO serial 75841444
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.
JOSEPH E WALSH JR HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLCSTE 4007700 BONHOMME AVEST LOUIS, MO 63105| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | COMPLETE MODULAR STORAGE SYSTEM, NAMELY, RACKS, RODS, CONTAINERS, AND MOUNTING AND SUPPORT HARDWARE | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |