Drawing for SHELF TRACK

USPTO serial 75841444

SHELF TRACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHELF TRACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.

JOSEPH E WALSH JR HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, PLCSTE 4007700 BONHOMME AVEST LOUIS, MO 63105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020COMPLETE MODULAR STORAGE SYSTEM, NAMELY, RACKS, RODS, CONTAINERS, AND MOUNTING AND SUPPORT HARDWAREACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 22, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 4, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 16, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 20, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 13, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 5, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Nov 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2002EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 18, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance