USPTO serial 75843007
SGS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SGS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
AMY H. CASCIO
AMY H CASCIO RICHARDS & O'NEIL, LLP885 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-4873UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | FOOD PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FRESH BROCCOLI SPROUTS, AGRICULTURAL SEEDS, PLANT SEEDS AND FLOWER SEEDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |