USPTO serial 75843609
MIGHTY POWER CORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIGHTY POWER CORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KRISTIN L BURNS
KRISTIN L BURNS PAUL HASTINGS JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP600 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 2400ATLANTA, GA 30308-2222UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automotive parts, namely spark plugs | ABANDONED | Dec 4, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 31, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |