USPTO serial 75845635
TOOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicago, IL
Chicao, IL
Calabasas, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES P HANRATH
JAMES P HANRATH MUCH SHELIST FREED DENENBERG191 N WACKER DR STE 1800CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, VIDEO AND AUDIO PROGRAMMING DISTRIBUTED VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by JONES, ADAM
- Other trademarks owned by KEENAN, MAYNARD JAMES
- Other trademarks owned by CAREY, DANNY
- Other trademarks owned by KEENAN, MAYNARD JAMES
- Other trademarks owned by JONES, ADAM
- Other trademarks owned by CAREY, DANNY
- Other trademarks owned by TOOL
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named TOOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 13, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |