USPTO serial 75847054
PUREFLAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PUREFLAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON AMSTER
MORTON AMSTER AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEVISION MONITORS | ACTIVE | Oct 26, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 11, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 2, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |