USPTO serial 75852132
ZERO TOLERANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZERO TOLERANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
S. PETER LUDWIG
JON A. DORF The Dorf Law Firm, LLP740 West Boston Post RoadSuite 304Mamaroneck, NY 10543Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | precious gemstones, namely, diamonds, jewelry, namely, rings, bracelets, necklaces, earrings and ornamental pins | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Wholesale distribution and retail store services featuring jewelry and gemstones | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of jewelry for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | jewelry design services for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Codiam, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Codiam, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ZERO TOLERANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 23, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |