USPTO serial 75854933
TYRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TYRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GRANT T LANGTON
GRANT T LANGTON JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO LLP1900 AVE OF THE STARS 7 TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2002 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 3, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |