USPTO serial 75855613
MY OTTO.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MY OTTO.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carol J. Hamilton
CAROL J HAMILTON HERZOG, CREBS & MCGHEE LLP515 N 6TH ST 24TH FLSAINT LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | On-line casino gaming services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 30, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |