USPTO serial 75855716
SWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3325040Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2007
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA
San Clemente, CA
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan M. Friedman
BRYAN M FRIEDMAN FRIEDMAN PETERSON STROFFE & GERARD19800 MACARTHUR BLVD STE 1100IRVINE, CA 92612-2425UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | JEWELRY AND WATCHES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 15, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SWELL COMMERCE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SWELL COMMERCE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Swell.com, Inc.,
- Other trademarks owned by SWELL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SWELL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Similar marks named SWELL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 6, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 10, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 23, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 21, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |