USPTO serial 75855772
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hamilton, Ontario, CA
Hamilton, Ontario, CA
Hamilton, Ontario, CA
HAMILTON, ONTARIO, CA
HAMILTON, ONTARIO, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick J. Jennings
Patrick J. Jennings Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP1200 Seventeenth Street, NWWashington, DC 20036-3006UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOR USE IN INDUSTRY AND SCIENCE, NAMELY IRON OXIDE PRODUCED AS A BY-PRODUCT OF HYDROCHLORIC ACID REGENERATION AND USED AS A RAW MATERIAL IN THE MANUFACTURE OF PERMANENT MAGNETS; AMMONIUM SULPHATE FOR USE IN INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING; ANHYDROUS AMMONIA FOR USE AS AN AGRICULTURAL FERTILIZER; COAL TAR; BENZENE, TOLULENE AND XYLENE; SCRAP GRAPHITE ELECTRODES USED AS A FEED STOCK IN PRODUCING NEW GRAPHITE ELECTRODES; DUST AND SLUDGE SOLID MATTER RECOVERED FROM IRON AND STEELMAKING PROCESSES AND USED AS A RAW MATERIAL IN THE PRODUCTION OF SINTERED IRON BASED BLAST FURNACE FEED STOCKS; NON FERROUS SCRAP NAMELY ZINC, ALUMINUM AND COPPER AND USED AS A RAW MATERIAL IN THE NON FERROUS METAL REFINING INDUSTRY, AND IRON OXIDE "MILL SCALE" CREATED DURING THE ANNEALING AND PROCESSING OF STEEL IN ROLLING MILLS AND USED AS A RAW MATERIAL IN FERROUS INDUSTRIAL PROCESSES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 004 | LIGHT OIL FOR INDUSTRIAL USE; FUELS, NAMELY METALLURGICAL COKE, FOR USE AS A FUEL IN BLAST FURNACES; AND METALLURGICAL COKE SCREENINGS, NAMELY NUT COKE, PEA COKE, WET BREEZE AND COKE BREEZE SOLD COMMERCIALLY AS A LOW GRADE CARBON BASED FUEL FOR USE IN IRON OXIDE BRIQUETTING OPERATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 006 | UNWROUGHT AND PARTIALLY WROUGHT COMMON METALS AND THEIR ALLOYS, NAMELY CARBON AND ALLOY STEEL PLATE, AND HOT ROLLED STEEL, FLAT STEEL IN COIL AND SHEET FORM; COLD ROLLED FLAT STEEL IN COIL AND SHEET FORM; FLAT ROLLED STEEL IN COIL AND SHEET FORM, NAMELY TIN PLATED STEEL AND TIN MILL "BLACKPLATE"; FLAT ROLLED STEEL IN COIL AND SHEET FORM, NAMELY ZINC COATED "GALVANIZED STEEL" AND ZINC/ALUMINUM ALLOY COATED STEEL; FLAT ROLLED STEEL IN COIL AND SHEET FORM, NAMELY VITREOUS ENAMELLING STEEL; FLAT ROLLED STEEL IN COIL AND SHEET FORM, NAMELY CHROMIUM COATED "TINFREE STEEL"; FLAT ROLLED STEEL IN COIL AND SHEET FORM, NAMELY ZINC/ZINC ALLOY COATED STEEL; FLAT ROLLED STEEL IN COIL AND SHEET FORM, NAMELY SURFACE TEXTURED, ROLL EMBOSSED STEEL; HOT, COLD ROLLED, ZINC COATED AND ZINC/ALUMINUM ALLOY COATED STEEL TUBES FOR USE IN SUBSEQUENT FORMING AND FABRICATING SUCH AS AUTOMOTIVE FRAMES AND THE LIKE; CAST PIG IRON; CASE IRON SCRAP, NAMELY BEACH IRON, COLD IRON, RUNNER SCRAP AND FERROUS SCRAP USED AS A RAW MATERIAL IN IRON AND STEEL REFINING PROCESSES; ZINC AND ZINC/ALUMINUM OXIDE USED AS A FEED STOCK IN NON FERROUS METAL PRODUCTION; AND SOLID RESIDUE FROM TIN PLATING COMPOSED PRIMARILY OF TIN AND USED AS FEED STOCK IN THE MANUFACTURE OF TIN PLATING ELECTRODES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 019 | BUILDING PRODUCTS NAMELY, BULK SLAG MATERIALS PRODUCED FROM AIR QUENCHED, WATER QUENCHED OR EXPANDED IRON AND STEELMAKING SLAGS FOR USE IN ROAD BUILDING, RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION OR AS AN ADDITIVE IN PORTLAND CEMENT AND CONCRETE FORMULATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 19, 2021 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2019 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 24, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2012 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 28, 2012 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 28, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 4, 2012 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 12, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2009 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2009 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Nov 24, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |