USPTO serial 75856539
LAPD.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAPD.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas I. Rozsa
THOMAS I ROZSA ROZSA & CHEN LLP15910 VENTURA BLVD STE 1601ENCINO, CA 91436-2815UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | AGENCIES FOR THE SALE OF ADVERTISING SPACE; ONLINE ORDERING SERVICES FEATURING JEWELRY, CLOCKS, WATCHES, PAPER DECALS, PATCHES, STICK-ON TATTOOS, LETTERS, MAGAZINES DEALING WITH THE SUBJECT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AND PRINTED CARTOONS ABOUT LAW ENFORCEMENT, ATHLETIC BAGS, BACKPACKS, ATTACHE CASES, CARRY-ON BAGS, CLUTCH BAGS, GYM BAGS, HANDBAGS, KNAPSACKS, LUGGAGE, PURSES, POCKETBOOKS, SHOULDER BAGS, SUITCASES, BRIEFCASES, WALLETS, MUGS MADE OF GLASS, PORCELAIN AND EARTHENWARE, GLASSWARE, CUPS, CANTEENS, AND CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD OR KITCHEN USE NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, MEN'S, WOMEN'S, AND CHILDREN'S CLOTHING, NAMELY, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, TANK TOPS, WOVEN SHIRTS, SWEATERS, CARDIGANS, VESTS, JACKETS, PANTS, SHORTS, HATS, CAPS, COATS, SHOES, SOCKS, UNDERWEAR, SKIRTS, DRESSES, BLOUSES, JUMPSUITS, AND LINGERIE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2009 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Feb 6, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 26, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |