Drawing for HIPERM

USPTO serial 75856711

HIPERM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LORENZO, GEORGE M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HIPERM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward P. Kelly

EDWARD P KELLY FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP666 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012truck and trunk liners, namely, fitted liners for the cargo area of vehiclesACTIVE
022truck and trunk liners, namely, unfitted for the cargo area of vehicles in the nature of a tarp; breath protection, namely, face masks; bags made of cloth, plastic and a combination of cloth and plastic that elimate or reduce bad smells and odors used for general storage purposes; bags made of cloth, plastic and a combination of cloth and plastic that elimate or reduce bad smells and odors, namely, bags used to store clothing, athletic gear, camping gear, hunting gear and dead animalsACTIVE
025Clothing, namely, outdoor wear for hunters and rangers, namely, jackets, trousers, pants; undergarments/underwear; socks, boot liners and boots; hand protection, namely gloves, mittens, glove liners; head coverings, namely, hats, hoods, capsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Jul 14, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
May 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 1, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 6, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance