USPTO serial 75856818
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LESLEY A MORADIAN
LESLEY A MORADIAN ESTEE LAUDER COMPANIES767 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10153UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | (Based on Use in Commerce) COSMETICS, NAMELY EYE SHADOWS, COLORED POWDERS, GLITTER FOR EYES, LIPS AND FACE, LOOSE FACE POWDER, LIPSTICK, LIP GLOSS, LIP LINERS, LIP PENCILS, BLUSH STICK, MASCARA, FACE TINTS | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2000 |
| 016 | (Based on Intent to Use) TEMPORARY TATTOOS TO BE APPLIED TO FACE AND/OR BODY | ACTIVE | — |
| 026 | (Based on Intent to Use) HAIR ORNAMENTS; HAIR BANDS, HAIR PINS; HAIR RIBBONS; BARRETTES; APPLIQUES; RHINESTONES BACKED WITH ADHESIVES TO BE APPLIED TO FACE AND/OR BODY; PEARLS BACKED WITH ADHESIVES TO BE APPLIED TO FACE AND/OR BODY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE SELECTION AND USE OF COSMETICS, BEAUTY TREATMENT AND TOILETRIES | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2000 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 3, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |