USPTO serial 75857074
LEAF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2969018Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- LEIPZIG, MARC J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEAF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SF-20101 TURKU, FI
SF-20101 TURKU, FI
SF-20101 TURKU, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert W. Sacoff,
ROBERT W SACOFF PATTISHALL MCAULIFFE ET AL311 S WACKER DR STE 5000CHICAGO, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | MEDICATED CONFECTIONARY AND MEDICATED SUGAR-FREE CONFECTIONARY FOODS, NAMELY, CHEWING GUM, CANDIES, HERBAL LOZENGES, PASTILLES AND TABLETS; MEDICATED CONFECTIONARY FOR USE AS A VITAMIN AND FOOD SUPPLEMENT | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | CANDIES, CHOCOLATE, CHOCOLATES CANDY BARS, LICORICE, NON-MEDICATED CONFECTIONARY, NAMELY, FROZEN CONFECTIONS, CANDY, CHOCOLATE, AND CHOCOLATE BARS, CONTAINING VITAMINS AND FOOD SUPPLEMENTS; SUGAR FREE CONFECTIONARY, NAMELY, SUGAR FREE CANDY, CHOCOLATE, CHOCOLATE BARS, AND CANDY BARS; SUGAR FREE CHEWING GUM; NON-MEDICATED HERBAL LOZENGES, PASTILLES AND TABLETS; CONSUMPTION ICE, NAMELY, ICE-CREAM, CHOCOLATE BARS, AND CANDY BARS; FROZEN CONFECTIONS, CANDY, CHOCOLATE, CHOCOLATE BARS, AND CANDY BARS; FOOD ADDITIVES FOR NON-NUTRITIONAL PURPOSES FOR USE AS A FLAVORING, INGREDIENT OR FILLER | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2011 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2011 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2011 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |