Drawing for DUDLEY DURSLEY

USPTO serial 75857358

DUDLEY DURSLEY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KREHELY, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DUDLEY DURSLEY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Elise A. Tenen-Aoki

ELISE A TENEN-AOKI WARNER BROS4000 WARNER BLVDBRIDGE BLDG 5TH FLBURBANK, CA 91522

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing for men, women and children - namely, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, jogging suits, trousers, pants, shorts, tank tops, rainwear, cloth bibs, skirts, blouses, dresses, suspenders, sweaters, jackets, coats, raincoats, snow suits, ties, robes, hats, caps, sunvisors, belts, scarves, sleepwear, pajamas, lingerie, underwear, boots, shoes, sneakers, sandals, booties, slipper socks, swimwear and masquerade and Halloween costumes and masks sold in connection therewithACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2003EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jun 9, 2003EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jun 6, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Dec 9, 2002EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Dec 9, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 11, 2002EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 5, 2002EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jun 5, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 27, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 13, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jun 27, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 18, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 2, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 1, 2000NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 19, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 5, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 18, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 25, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 24, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 17, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance