USPTO serial 75857415
GLASFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2753462Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2003
- Examiner
- MARCY, AMY ALFIERI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GLASFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth V. Cardoza
GAIL M HASHIMOTO HOPKINS & CARLEY70 S FIRST STSAN JOSE, CA 95113-2406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SAFETY EQUIPMENT, NAMELY SAFETY MARKERS, WARNING AND GUIDE DEVICES IN THE NATURE OF REFLECTIVE MARKERS USED TO GUIDE TRAFFIC FOR ROADWAY, TRAIL AND UTILITY PURPOSES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 18, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 31, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 13, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |