Drawing for COLORADO STEAKHOUSE

USPTO serial 75857797

COLORADO STEAKHOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLORADO STEAKHOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GREGORY B COY

GREGORY B COY WOODARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON MORIARTY ET ALBANK 1 CTR TWR STE 3700111 MONUMENT CIRINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042restaurant servicesACTIVEOct 17, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 13, 2004MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Dec 6, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Oct 13, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Aug 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 25, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Apr 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 29, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jan 29, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 10, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Oct 12, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Oct 7, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Mar 10, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
Jan 7, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Oct 28, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Sep 25, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Sep 25, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Sep 19, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Sep 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 10, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Mar 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 13, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 23, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 21, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance