USPTO serial 75857872
CANBREAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CANBREAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul A. Welter
PAUL A WELTER MERCHANT & GOULD PCP O BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DIAGNOSTIC TEST KITS COMPRISED OF REAGENTS FOR SCIENTIFIC OR RESEARCH USE IN THE AREAS OF CANCER, GENDER AND SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, IMMUNE-RELATED DISORDERS AND IMMUNE-MODULATION, NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES, AGE-RELATED ILLNESSES, ANTIVIRAL AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE RESEARCH | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS, ANTIVIRALS, DRUG DELIVERY BIOSYSTEMS, DRUG TESTING PRODUCTS, NAMELY, MEDICAL DIAGNOSTIC REAGENTS, AND DIAGNOSTIC TEST KITS COMPRISED OF REAGENTS FOR MEDICAL OR LABORATORY USE, ALL OF THE ABOVE FOR THE USE IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER, GENDER AND SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, IMMUNE-RELATED DISORDERS AND IMMUNE-RELATED ILLNESSES AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | LABORATORY ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, NAMELY, LABORATORY INSTRUMENTS AND VIALS USED TO ANALYZE AND PREPARE COMPOUNDS IN THE FIELDS OF CANCER, GENDER AND SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, IMMUNE-RELATED DISORDERS AND IMMUNE-MODULATION, NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES, AGE-RELATED ILLNESSES, ANTIVIRAL AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE RESEARCH | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | TESTING OF NEW DRUGS FOR OTHERS, MEDICAL SERVICES, NAMELY, DIAGNOSIS TREATMENT AND RESEARCH SERVICES, DEVELOPMENT OF ROBOTIC SYSTEMS TO ANALYZE AND PREPARE COMPOUNDS, RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT RELATING TO AUTOMATIZED BIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSTIC ASSAYS USING ROBOTIC SYSTEMS, MEDICAL INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY, DATA GATHERING, PROCESSING, ACQUISITION AND MANAGEMENT, ALL OF THE ABOVE FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER, GENDER AND SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, IMMUNE-RELATED DISORDERS AND IMMUNO MODULATION NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES, AGE RELATED ILLNESSES, ANTIVIRALS AND ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cambreal Therodiagnostics International Inc
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CANBREAL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |