USPTO serial 75858010
VAN GOGH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 31, 2011
- Examiner
- GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with VAN GOGH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EXPORT, PA
PEACHTREE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Hamilton HM, BM
PEACHTREE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Hamilton HM, BM
PEACHTREE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Hamilton HM, BM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mainak H. Mehta
Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B. StreetSuite 2200San Diego, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 027 | Hard surface coverings for floors; vinyl floor coverings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KARNDEAN INTERNATIONAL LLC
- Other trademarks owned by PEACHTREE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by PEACHTREE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by PEACHTREE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named VAN GOGH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 23, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 15, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 7, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 2, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 31, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 22, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2010 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 22, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 24, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 19, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |