Drawing for CHILDREN'S TECHNOLOGY GROUP

USPTO serial 75858420

CHILDREN'S TECHNOLOGY GROUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHILDREN'S TECHNOLOGY GROUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

RITA A. ABBATI

RITA A ABBATI LYON & LYON LLPLIBRARY TWR633 W 5TH ST STE 4700LOS ANGELES, CA 90071-2043

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Children’ s educational computer softwareACTIVEMar 1, 1998

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 20, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jul 2, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Mar 8, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Feb 7, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Feb 7, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jan 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 24, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 13, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 11, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance