USPTO serial 75858779
PICARD TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICARD TECHNOLOGIES INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. Craig Armstrong
R CRAIG ARMSTRONG BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS LLP100 QUEEN ST STE 1100OTTAWA, ON K1P 1J9CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | SOFTWARE FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE AND CONTROL, NAMELY DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT, DOCUMENT HISTORY TRACKING AND DOCUMENT CHANGE CONTROL, FOR TRACKING DOCUMENTS, EQUIPMENT AND PROCESSES IN PRODUCTION FACILITIES RELATED TO AVIATION, PHARMACEUTICAL, FOOD, AND MANUFACTURING; SOFTWARE WHICH CONTROLS, MONITORS AND TRACKS AUTOMATED PRODUCTION OF AVIATION, PHARMACEUTICAL, AND FOOD PRODUCTS; SOFTWARE FOR USE IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT FOR AVIATION, PHARMACEUTICAL, FOOD AND MANUFACTURING AND PROCESS FACILITIES, NAMELY SOFTWARE FOR STORING, ORGANIZING AND REPORTING ON INFORMATION RELATED TO PHYSICAL ORGANIZATION OF SAID FACILITIES, PRODUCTION RECORDS, PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS, AND MONITORING AND PROJECTING COSTS OF PRODUCTION; SOFTWARE FOR TRAINING INDIVIDUALS TO USE THE ABOVE SOFTWARE, AND FOR REPORTING PROGRESS OF TRAINING OF SUCH INDIVIDUALS; SOFTWARE FOR MACHINE VISION SYSTEMS, TO CONTROL MEASUREMENT AND INSPECTION FOR QUALITY CONTROL PURPOSES ON AN ASSEMBLY LINE IN PRODUCTION FACULTIES; SOFTWARE FOR SORTING COSMETICS BY COLOUR AND FOR ASSEMBLY VERIFICATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |