USPTO serial 75858841
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brittany Estell
Brittany Estell WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.5601 GREAT OAKS PARKWAYSAN JOSE, CA 95119UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers and computer hard and floppy disk drives; computers and computer hard and floppy disk drives with integrated and printed circuits; blank magnetic disks; computer programs for data storage on computer hard and floppy disk drives; computer hard and floppy disk drives and computer programs; computer software used to directly store digital images into cameras; instruction manuals sold as a unit therewith for the aforesaid goods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1999 |
| 016 | PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, INSTRUCTIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIAL, BOOKS, NEWSLETTERS AND MAGAZINES RELATING TO COMPUTER HARDWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR DATA STORAGE ON COMPUTER HARD AND FLOPPY DISK DRIVES; PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, INSTRUCTIONAL AND TEACHING MATERIAL, BOOKS, NEWSLETTERS AND MAGAZINES RELATING TO STORING DIGITAL IMAGES INTO CAMERAS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1999 |
| 037 | Upgrading of computer hardware; maintenance of computer hardware, namely, computer hard and floppy disk drives | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1999 |
| 042 | Computer hardware design for others; consultation services in the field of computer hardware; computer systems analysis; computer software design for others; updating of computer software for others; maintenance of computer software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 1999 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 16, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |