USPTO serial 75859036
DOCTOR FLAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOCTOR FLAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NICKOLAS E. WESTMAN
NICKOLAS E WESTMAN WESTMAN, CHAMPLIN & KELLY, PASTE 1600 INTERNATIONAL CTR900 SECOND AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3319Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS CONSISTING OF FLAX SEEDS; FLAX SEED AND FLAX SEED OIL BASED FOOD SUPPLEMENTS CONTAINING NATURAL VITAMINS AND MINERALS; FOOD SUPPLEMENTS BASED UPON CEREAL GRAINS AND OIL BEARING PLANT SEEDS; AND FOOD SUPPLEMENT CAPLET AND DIETARY AND NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENT IN THE FORM OF A BAR | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 17, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |