USPTO serial 75859372
HUMAN LIFE ADVOCATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 22, 2002
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HUMAN LIFE ADVOCATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CLRF ADVOCATES, INC., an affiliate of the Christian Legal Society
Annandale, VA
Other trademarks owned by CLRF ADVOCATES, INC., an affiliate of the Christian Legal Society
CLRF ADVOCATES, INC., an affiliate of the Christian Legal Society
Springfield, VA
Other trademarks owned by CLRF ADVOCATES, INC., an affiliate of the Christian Legal Society
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George E. Quillin
Anne F. Downey, Esq. Downey & Downey8999 Rockwood Rd.Boston, NY 14025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | public interest legal services relating to the defense of the sanctity and inalienable right to life | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 11, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CLRF ADVOCATES, INC., an affiliate of the Christian Legal Society
- Other trademarks owned by CLRF ADVOCATES, INC., an affiliate of the Christian Legal Society
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HUMAN LIFE ADVOCATES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 22, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |