Drawing for MAGNER

USPTO serial 75859488

MAGNER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAGNER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

A. Jason Mirabito

A JASON MIRABITO MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRISGLOVSKY AND POPEO LCONE FINANCIAL CTRBOSTON, MA 02111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages, namely, perry and hard alcoholic ciderACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 18, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Nov 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 18, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 28, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Apr 23, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 18, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 24, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Oct 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 31, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 17, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 3, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jan 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 3, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 9, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 27, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance