USPTO serial 75859488
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hereford HR4 OLD, GB
DUBLIN 10, IE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Jason Mirabito
A JASON MIRABITO MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRISGLOVSKY AND POPEO LCONE FINANCIAL CTRBOSTON, MA 02111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, perry and hard alcoholic cider | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |