USPTO serial 75859666
FLEXIBLE LOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 28, 2001
- Examiner
- COGGINS, ROBERT H
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FLEXIBLE LOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig J.J. Snyder
CRAIG J.J. SNYDER CRAIG J.J. SNYDER PC67 WALL ST STE 2211NEW YORK, NY 10005-3101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 8, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 4, 2001 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |