USPTO serial 75859872
INTEL NETSTRUCTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2911320Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2004
- Examiner
- THOMPKINS, TRICIA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTEL NETSTRUCTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine M. Basile
Katherine M. Basile Reed Smith LLPP.O. Box 488Reed Smith Docketing DepartmentPittsburgh, PA 15230Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; routers; hubs; servers; switches; integrated circuits; computer firmware, namely computer operating systems software; fixed function servers; computer networking hardware; semiconductor devices; computer hardware and software for creating, facilitating, and managing remote access to and communication with local area networks (LANs), virtual private networks (VPN), wide area networks (WANs) and global computer networks; router, switch, hub and server operating software; computer software for use in providing multiple user access to a global computer information network for searching, retrieving, transferring, manipulating and disseminating a wide range of information; application software, namely, computer communications software, inter-network access and application management software, network management software, protocol translation software, and teleconferencing software; computer software tools for the facilitation of third party software applications; computer network adapters; computer hardware and software for wireless network communications; remote access servers, remote access adapters, remote access software, and remote access gateways; networking equipment, namely, digital loop carriers, multiplexers, optical transmitters, fiber optic terminals; and manuals sold as a unit and downloadable from a global computer network | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |